The diners' claims 'are based solely on purchases made directly from restaurants or from non-defendant meal-delivery platforms,' Kaplan wrote. District Judge Lewis Kaplan said it would be 'unconscionable' to enforce the defendants' 'infinite' arbitration clauses, so named because their terms would require arbitration of any disputes regardless of subject matter. In response, the companies said that by accepting the terms of use for their platforms, diners agreed to arbitrate their claims individually and not pursue a class action in court.

Diners said this forced them to pay artificially high prices for meals they ordered elsewhere.

The lawsuit accused the meal delivery companies of entering illegal agreements that prevented restaurants using their platforms from selling meals directly to consumers at lower prices.

ReutersĪ federal judge in Manhattan on Thursday said Grubhub, Uber Eats and Postmates cannot force diners who have used their platforms into binding arbitration over claims they conspired to drive up prices for restaurant meals during the COVID-19 pandemic. By Jonathan StempelĪ Grubhub delivery person rides in Manhattan, New York City, U.S., May 9, 2022. Grubhub, Uber Eats, Postmates cannot arbitrate diners' claims over high pricesĪ federal judge in Manhattan on Thursday said Grubhub, Uber Eats and Postmates cannot force diners who have used their platforms into binding arbitration over claims they conspired to drive up prices for restaurant meals during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Is grubhub seamless